HomeUpSearchMail
NEW
Calibrating the compass readings
If one measures with a compass (like a Suunto
KB-20) the azimuth (azimag), one has to be aware that
the
magnetic north is not the same as the true (real) north. The
differance
between magnetic- and true north (magn-true northx) has to
be
determined before getting the true azimuth (azic) of an
aligment
or direction, in the following way:
azic = azimag + magn-true northx
Evaluation of below mentioned calibration methods
In all results of specific sites the following compensation has been
used:
- if magn-true north1 is available and magn-true north2
is almost the same; magn-true north1 will be used.
Round azic to 5' and it will have an error +/- 20'. - if
only magn-true north2 is available, magn-true north2
will be used.
Round azic to 5' and it will have an error +/- 35'. - if
magn-true north3 is totally different from magn-true2;
magn-true north3 will be used.
Round azic to 10' and it will have an error +/- 20'. - method
magn-true north4.
Round azic to 5' and it will have an error +/- 15'.
Remark: the above errors in azic is with out any possible
systemetic errors, e.g. due to iron contained rock, wrong measurement
equipement,
etc.
Calibration methods
So the compass reads not the true azimuth (azic) but the
magnetic
azimuth (azimag, all measured in 1996), thus the compass
reading
should be calibrated. To do this calibrating, some methods of obtaining
magn-true north are being investigated:
- magn-true north1: use the suns azimuth (azisun)
on a particular time of the day and compare this with the calculated
azimuth
(azical).
Differance between suns azimuth measured and
calculated
Date |
Time (local time) |
azisun |
latitude |
longitude |
azical |
magn-true north1 |
4/8/96 |
20:21 |
300o30' |
58o32' |
3o32' |
291o41' |
-8o49' |
4/8/96 |
21:11 |
312o0' |
58o32' |
3o32' |
302o9' |
-9o51' |
5/8/96 |
09:20 |
115o0' |
59o0' |
3o14' |
107o44' |
-7o16' |
6/8/96 |
17:44 |
265o30' |
59o0' |
3o12' |
258o23' |
-7o7' |
6/8/96 |
21:00 |
308o0' |
59o0' |
3o14' |
299o51' |
-8o9' |
7/8/96 |
11:36 |
151o30' |
59o0' |
3o11' |
145o14' |
-6o16' |
8/8/96 |
21:01 |
309o0' |
58o12' |
6o45' |
296o54' |
-12o6' |
9/8/96 |
09:02 |
108o30' |
58o12' |
6o45' |
100o44' |
-7o46' |
13/8/96 |
20:27 |
293o30' |
57o28' |
5o22' |
290o25' |
-3o5' |
14/8/96 |
11:17 |
140o6' |
57o25' |
5o13' |
137o22' |
-2o44' |
14/8/96 |
20:07 |
295o6' |
56o50' |
5o4' |
286o28' |
-8o38' |
- magn-true north2: determine the magn-true
north2
by means of the Ordnance Survey maps or by
URL for Magn-grid and using the true-grid estimation
of A. Thom (delta(longitude)*sin latitude).
Differance between magnetic and true north
according
to OS maps
|
|
map |
|
|
|
Location |
magn-true north2 |
year |
magn-grid |
delta/year |
true-grid |
Delfour |
-6o42' |
1988 |
-6o30' |
10' |
1o32' |
Achavanich |
-6o38' |
1990 |
-6o30' |
10' |
1o8' |
Corrimony |
-7o15' |
1997 |
-5o0' |
7.5' |
2o23' |
Ring of Brodgar |
-6o13' |
1979 |
-8o0' |
10' |
1o3' |
Maeshowe |
-6o13' |
1979 |
-8o0' |
10' |
1o3' |
Wideford Hill |
-6o13' |
1979 |
-8o0' |
10' |
1o3' |
Callanish I |
-8o26' |
1988 |
-5o30' |
10' |
4o16' |
Rudh' An Dunain |
-8o27' |
1996 |
-5o0' |
7.5' |
3o27' |
- magn-true north3: By determining azimag
of
distant objects and comparing them with azim. azim
can be gotten from the OS maps and difference true-map north.
Differance between OS-map azimuth and magnetic
azimuth
Location |
azimag |
azim |
magn-true north3 |
Maeshowe |
226o30' |
219o57' |
-6o33' |
Rudh' An Dunain |
163o0' |
146o33' |
-16o27' |
Remark: The magn-true north3 of Rudh' An Dunain is
quiet
big! This could be due to the fact that there is much ferro rock in the
neighbourhood (like the close by Cullin Hills at some 7 km).
- magn-true north4: not used during this
research, but
it seems to be the best method when using the compass:
- determine of three distant object the azimag
- determine the azim of these three objects (using the
true-map north differance) .
- determine the difference between azimag and azim
and average it over the three samples. This is magn-true north4
Some accuracy considerations
- The magn-true north1 seems to have an error of some
15'.
This is build up of the error of azisun (around 15') and
azical (around 5'). - The magn-true north2
seems to have an error of some
30'.
This is deducted from: 1' for true-grid (looking at the interpolation
of the differances on 1:50.000 map for its NE and NW corners) and 30'
for magn-grid error.
Pathfinder maps of Ordnance Survey are being used (1:25.000). - The
magn-true north3 seems to have an error of some
15'.
This is build up of the error of azim (around 5') and azimag
(around 15'). - The error in the averaged magn-true north4
is around
10'
It is decreases by a factor of 1.7 (square root of 3) with regard to
the error in magn-true north3. - The error in the
measured (magnetic) azimuth (azimag
or azisun)
is at least 15' (depending on type of compass).
- The error in the latitude is around 1' (or in case *, 3').
Measured from OS-maps (1:50.000 or 1:25.000) or incase of * from Burl. - The
error in the calculated suns azimuth (azical)
should be
within 5'.
This is according to the accuracy of the SkyMap program (some
arcseconds) and the unaccuracy of the latitude (1' to 3', see
above). - The error in the altitude of the horizon (althor)
is
some 5'.
This due to measurement errors from the slides of the horizon. - The
error in the azim could be some 5'.
Coming from errors in true-map north (1') and readings from OS map
(4').
Disclaimer and Copyright
HomeUpSearchMail
Last content related changes: July 18, 2000